Public Beta · Not legal advice
← Map

Research protocol

Methodology

The map contains two independent data models: direct AIGC copyright case law and a narrowly admitted legislation inventory. Their statuses and visual semantics are not interchangeable.

Case-law admission rule

Case Law includes direct AI/AIGC copyright judgments, appellate decisions, substantive interim and pleading-stage decisions, pending direct proceedings, and directly relevant supranational proceedings. Foundational and analogical authorities are excluded. A matter represents one litigation chain, while every material decision or event remains a separate child record.

Judicial proposition status

Legislation admission rule

Legislation is not a generic AI-regulation tracker. Records must concern direct AIGC/copyright rules, closely adjacent creator protections, or older statutory provisions central to current AI/copyright analysis. Non-binding codes, guidance, reports and consultations are not presented as legislation.

Legislative status

In force, Adopted, Partially applicable, Bill, Draft and Withdrawn are distinct. Bills and drafts are proposals, never displayed as enacted law. Partially applicable records retain their phased applicability information.

Scope tiers

Exclusions and watchlists

Internal exclusion and quality-control records support editorial review but are not published as substantive legal conclusions. Unverified proposals and non-binding materials remain excluded or on a watchlist until they meet the admission rule.

Sources and verification

Official primary sources are preferred. Supporting sources are used where necessary and are identified separately. Each public record preserves its last-verification date.

Updates

The displayed dataset was last verified on 24 August 2026. This Public Beta may contain omissions or errors and is not legal advice.