Public Beta · Not legal advice
← Interactive map

Germany · DE-007

Penguin Random House Verlagsgruppe v OpenAI Ireland

ALLEGEDLG Munchen IPending - no merits ruling identified
TrainingMemorisationModel-Level ReproductionOutputsSubstantial Similarity

Key holding or allegation

Plaintiff allegations only; no merits decision identified by the cutoff.

Why it matters

Extends German model-memorisation/output litigation beyond collecting-society lyric claims into books and character imagery.

Facts

Publisher alleges ChatGPT can reproduce recognisable text and generate closely resembling character illustrations from the Der kleine Drache Kokosnuss books, relied on as evidence of unauthorised training/memorisation.

Issues before the court

Training, model memorisation and output infringement.

What the court did not decide

All merits questions.

Procedural timeline

2026-03-27

LG Munchen I
Complaint filed: Penguin Random House alleges ChatGPT reproduced recognisable text and character imagery from Der kleine Drache Kokosnuss, supporting training/memorisation/output claims.

ALLEGED