Public Beta · Not legal advice
← Interactive map

Japan · JP-002

Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun v Perplexity AI

ALLEGEDTokyo District CourtPending - no merits ruling
Retrieval / RAGOutputsReproductionTraining Data AcquisitionRights Reservation / Opt-OutRemedies

Key holding or allegation

Plaintiff allegations only; Perplexity contested the claims at the first oral hearing and no merits decision was identified by the cutoff.

Why it matters

Major Japanese AI-search copyright litigation likely to test application of Japanese copyright exceptions and access restrictions if it reaches merits.

Facts

Nikkei and Asahi allege unauthorised copying/storage and use of newspaper articles in AI-generated search answers, including despite technical measures intended to restrict automated access.

Issues before the court

Whether acquisition, storage, retrieval and output conduct infringe and what remedies are available.

What the court did not decide

No merits holding and no judicial ruling on Article 30-4 should be attributed.

Procedural timeline

2025-08-26

Tokyo District Court
Complaint filed: Nikkei and Asahi filed claims alleging unauthorised copying/storage of newspaper content and use in Perplexity AI search answers.

ALLEGED
2026-05-14

Tokyo District Court
First oral hearing: First oral hearing held; Perplexity sought dismissal/contested the claims.

ALLEGED