Public Beta · Not legal advice
← Interactive map

United States · US-017

Nazemian v NVIDIA

PLEADING SURVIVEDU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California4:24-cv-01454Pending - training and contributory theories survived in large part
TrainingTraining Data AcquisitionTraining Data TraceabilitySecondary / Contributory Liability

Key holding or allegation

Significant training claims survived where plaintiffs sufficiently connected works to alleged training materials; a contributory theory based on downloading/processing scripts also survived, while vicarious liability was narrowed.

Why it matters

Direct authority on training-data nexus and alleged provider facilitation of data acquisition.

Facts

Authors alleged that copyrighted books were used to train NVIDIA Megatron models and that NVIDIA supplied scripts facilitating acquisition/processing of training data.

Issues before the court

Whether plaintiffs sufficiently connected works to models and plausibly alleged direct and contributory infringement.

What the court did not decide

No final finding of infringement or rejection of fair use.

Procedural timeline

2026-05

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Motion-to-dismiss ruling: Training claims survived where plaintiffs sufficiently connected works to alleged Megatron training materials; a contributory theory based on NVIDIA's alleged downloading/processing scripts also survived.

PLEADING SURVIVED