Key holding or allegation
The action was dismissed for lack of Article III standing, and reconsideration was denied.
Why it matters
Important contrasting CMI/standing outcome alongside The Intercept and New York Times litigation.
Facts
Publishers alleged CMI removal in connection with generative-AI use of their articles.
Issues before the court
Whether plaintiffs alleged concrete injury sufficient for Article III standing.
What the court did not decide
Dismissal did not determine whether OpenAI training or outputs infringed copyright on the merits.
Procedural timeline
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Dismissal and reconsideration ruling: Action dismissed for lack of Article III standing; reconsideration later denied.