Public Beta · Not legal advice
← Interactive map

United States · US-041

S.A. Jamendo v NVIDIA Corporation

ALLEGEDU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California5:26-cv-06206; apparent refile 5:26-cv-11754Original action dismissed without prejudice; refile reported, merits unadjudicated
TrainingTraining Data AcquisitionLicensingReproductionContract / Dataset Terms

Key holding or allegation

Allegations only. Jamendo voluntarily dismissed the original action without prejudice on 9 Oct 2026; public docket metadata indicates a new action opened 12 Oct, but the refiled complaint was not publicly verified by the cutoff.

Why it matters

Direct dispute over research-dataset licence limits and commercial generative-audio training.

Facts

Jamendo alleges NVIDIA used the MTG-Jamendo dataset, released for non-commercial research, to train commercial generative-audio systems without the required licence.

Issues before the court

Whether use of the dataset and individual tracks for commercial model training exceeded licence terms and infringed copyright.

What the court did not decide

No court has decided ownership, licence scope, infringement, fair use, damages or the status/content of the apparent refiled complaint.

Procedural timeline

2026-06-22

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Complaint filed: Jamendo alleged unlicensed commercial use of the research-only MTG-Jamendo dataset to train Fugatto and Audio Flamingo.

ALLEGED
2026-10-09

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Voluntary dismissal: Jamendo voluntarily dismissed the action without prejudice before a merits decision.

NOT DECIDED
2026-10-12

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Apparent refiling docket opened: Public docket metadata indicates a new Jamendo v NVIDIA action, but the operative complaint was not publicly verified by the cutoff.

ALLEGED